Peter Lawford as Ernest Mullett |
Ernest Mullet's two successes in life are marrying Judith Harlow and displaying a perfect bloom from his own garden in his lapel each day. When his wife's affections are stolen by his co-worker Roger Farnum, Ernest resolves to kill the man. The Mullets are divorced and things settle down for a few months, but when Roger begins sporting a flower in his buttonhole each morning from a local florist, Ernest's anger and jealousy are rekindled and he sets his mind to murder.
"Crimson Witness" was first published here |
Ernest spends the evening at home with his sister before returning to the office after two a.m. He opens the safe, takes $5000 in cash, and leaves Roger's corpse in full view. A cleaner finds the body just after 6 a.m. and the police question employees as they arrive. Unfortunately, Ernest confirms that Roger had a white gardenia in his buttonhole, while the crimson rose petal found inside the safe matches the flower in Ernest's lapel.
Martha Hyer as Judith Mullett |
Surely attracted by the twist ending, the producers of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour bought the rights to the story and assigned it to the writing team of Morton Fine and David Friedkin, who expanded it into a highly entertaining television program that aired on Monday, January 4, 1965. Everything works in "Crimson Witness": the dialogue is sparkling, the direction solid, the performances perfect. The music score, by jazz musician Benny Carter, underscores each scene and highlights the absurdity of the situation.
Joanna Moore as Madeline |
Baldwin points out that Ernest wears a different rose in his lapel each day and Baldwin's own beautiful secretary enters, demonstrating that this office is one where women are hired for their looks. The entire episode of "Crimson Witness" is almost like an episode of the much later TV series Mad Men in its depiction of the relations between the sexes in a big-city office in 1965. In any case, Baldwin tells Ernest that he is being replaced as plant manager by his brother Farnum. There is a cut to Ernest's home, where we see Farnum, overweight, balding, and sporting a walrus mustache, contrasted with Ernest, who is suave and handsome. Ernest's wife Judith is nonplussed when Ernest tells her that Farnum is replacing him at work; poor Ernest can't even get the best of his brother physically, as he learns when he tries to throw his long-term house guest out and instead ends up on the floor himself.
Julie London as Barbara |
In his new (smaller) office, Ernest meets his new secretary, Madeline, whom which he shares with five other men. Madeine is beautiful, yet less refined in speech and manner than Barbara. Even she brags about Farnum! Ernest visits his brother in the office that used to be his and Farnum remarks that he now wears a flower in his lapel, though his flower is exotic and must be flown in, unlike Ernest's home-grown variety. Farnum has an annoying habit of quoting great authors, such as Jane Austen and Hegel, and has already discovered that Ernest was "'dipping into the till,'" something he volunteers to cover up. Farnum does not even try to disguise his glee at stealing Ernest's job and wife; in addition to the other negative qualities that make him a success in business and with beautiful women, Farnum is a blackmailer, offering to keep quiet in exchange for his brother's friendship.
Roger C. Carmel as Farnum Mullett |
Ernest and Madeline dine out together, allowing him to establish an alibi; she is forward and invites him back to her place for drinks but he declines, instead returning to the office to stage the murder scene for discovery in the morning. When the sun comes up, Ernest is interviewed by two detectives in Farnum's office, where a black outline has replaced the corpse. Now that Farnum is dead, Ernest's unfaithful wife rushes to his arms, begging forgiveness. As Judy, Martha Hyer really pours it on in this scene; she is deadpan and funny, kissing his head and caressing his ear while he speaks to his boss on the phone. It is a credit to Peter Lawford as an actor that he made it through this scene without dissolving into giggles.
Alan Baxter as Baldwin |
Paul Comi |
Judith Mullett, Ernest's unfaithful wife, is played with icy cool by Martha Hyer (1924-2014), who was on screen from 1946 to 1974 and who appeared in one other episode of The Alfred Hitchcock Hour. She published her autobiography in 1990.
Larry Thor |
Nancy Hseuh |
Giving an entertaining performance as Farnum Mullett is Roger C. Carmel (1932-1986), who seemed to light up the screen whenever he appeared. He was on TV and in film from 1958 to 1986 and played memorable roles on Batman and Star Trek, as well as being a regular on the TV series, The Mothers-In-Law (1967-68). Unfortunately, this was his only appearance on the Hitchcock show.
In smaller roles:
- Alan Baxter (1908-1976) as Baldwin, Ernest's boss; he served in the Army Air Corps in World War Two and studied at the Group Theatre; he was on screen from 1935-1971 and had a part in Hitchcock's classic, Saboteur (1942). He was also seen on Thriller, The Outer Limits, and in one episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, "Backward, Turn Backward."
- Paul Comi (1932-2016) as the younger of the two detectives who interview Ernest after the murder; he was on screen from 1958-1995, mostly on TV, and appeared on The Twilight Zone, Star Trek, and one episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents.
- Larry Thor (1916-1976) as the older detective; he was born in Canada as Arnlelfur Lawrence Thorsteinson and he was known chiefly as a radio broadcaster and announcer, playing roles in film and television from 1952-74.
- Nancy Hseuh (1941-1980) plays Baldwin's secretary; she was on film briefly as a child from 1945-1947 and then had a career as an adult onscreen from 1960-1978, including a role in Peter Bogdanovich's Targets (1968).
Benny Carter (1907-2003), who composed the score for this episode, was a saxophone player and bandleader who had a long and successful career writing and playing jazz and swing music. He composed scores for TV and film from 1957-1986 and there is a website devoted to him here.
Once again, David Friedkin did not just co-write "Crimson Witness" with Morton Fine; he also directed it, and he does a fine job, keeping the action moving swiftly and handling the humor deftly.
"Crimson Witness" is not yet available on DVD in the U.S. but it may be viewed online for free here.
Sources:
"Crimson Witness." The Alfred Hitchcock Hour, season 10, episode 12, NBC, 4 Jan. 1965.
Elliston, Nigel. "Crimson Witness." The London Mystery Selection, Dec. 1962, pp. 21–26.
Grams, Martin, and Patrik Wikstrom. The Alfred Hitchcock Presents Companion. OTR Pub., 2001.
IMDb, IMDb.com, www.imdb.com/.
"Olive Elliston." Olive ELLISTON - Death - Ipswich Star Announcements - Family Notices 24, www.familynotices24.co.uk/est/view/4289640/olive-elliston.
"Radio Times 1923-2009." BBC News, BBC, genome.ch.bbc.co.uk/schedules/light/1960-03-07.
Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 19 Apr. 2020, www.wikipedia.org/.
In two weeks: "Thou Still Unravished Bride," starring Ron Randell and David Carradine!
This is a little out of the ordinary scope here, but I thought I'd pass it along:
ReplyDeleteIn 1965, the Chicago Sun-Times had a columnist named Paul Molloy, who was the paper's TV columnist.
Molloy had had that position since the late '50s, but had long since expanded to a general column; He still wrote anything about TV that he felt strongly about.
In his Sunday column one week (actually, it was in the Sun-Times's TV magazine), Molloy wrote a very negative column about this very Hitchcock Hour.
Paul Molloy was a strict Catholic, the father of eight children, and an extremely moralistic man; his disapproval of "Crimson Witness" centered on the fact that almost all of the characters were far from moral in their behavior, and that was not suitable for the "family medium" that TV was supposed to be.
In passing, Molloy noted his own disapproval of Alfred Hitchcock's two most recent movies, Psycho and The Birds; he denounced Psycho in toto, and dismissed The Birds as "a bomb"; I can't recall offhand, but I think Hitchcock's own Catholicism may have entered into Molloy's criticism.
This was part of an overall campaign on Molloy's part to "clean up TV", which in his view was already headed to hell in a basket in 1965; Molloy was already on the record opposing people saying damn and hell (the "slippery slope" argument), so you can probably guess what the other arguments were.
There might have been an oblique reference to Peter Lawford's then-Kennedy connection, but I can't find the column to confirm that.
Oh, by the way, Roger Ebert didn't land at the Sun-Times for another two years, so there's that …
My point is that when you deal with TV of A Certain Vintage, you ought to check out the context of its own era.
In the '60s, Paul Molloy was hardly unique in his views; as a columnist for an important Chicago newspaper (publisher Marshall Field syndicated his work nationally), he commanded a considerable audience - most of which followed him avidly.
Just thought you might be interested …
That's very interesting and thanks for pointing it out. I'll look for the article online.
ReplyDeleteYou mention it already, but about the biggest attraction of this one is seeing the two actors "play against type," with Peter Lawford as a likable "loser" and Roger Carmel as his "hot shot" brother.
ReplyDeleteOne of Peter Lawford's underrated roles in suspense stories is an early ' 70s TV movie called A STEP OUT OF LINE, with Peter Falk and Vic Morrow. It's a heist story, making it SLIGHTLY like OCEAN'S ELEVEN with him, but it's a whole lot more downbeat than that one.
And even though I mention it a lot, one of Martha Hyer's more unusual ones is in the 1967 film THE HAPPENING, a really strange comedy-drama about a kidnapping that happens accidentally. Speaking of her and "shifting loyalties," she plays the victim's wife, who tries to avoid paying the ransom!
(But it always seems to fly completely below the radar, so I'm pretty sure it's never made it to DVD.)
Thanks, Grant! There's a funny scene in this episode where Lawford attacks Carmel and Carmel flips him over his shoulder. It's completely the opposite of what one would expect.
ReplyDeleteSorry, can't agree with the favorable review. I thought this was one of the weakest AH hour-long efforts. Static, talky and dull, without a likeable or even interesting character in sight. Lawford snoozed though the lead role and nobody else seemed all that involved, either. The goofy music and ridiculous casting of Carmel as a babe magnet suggest that the episode was intended as black comedy. Instead it sagged into limp self-parody.
ReplyDeleteThe only redeeming feature was Hitch playing surveyor. At least he seemed interested in his lines, which is more than I can say about anybody in the actual episode.
I'm sorry you don't like it! I got a big kick out of it. But then, I didn't care for "The Sign of Satan" and everyone else seems to like it.
ReplyDelete