"Over There--Darkness" was first published in the October 1958 issue of a digest called Sleuth Mystery Magazine. This was the first of only two issues of this periodical, which was published in cooperation with the Mystery Writers of America.
The story's author, William O'Farrell (1904-1962), wrote short stories and novels from 1941 to 1962. His stories appeared in the slicks from 1941 to 1947 and in the digests from 1955 to 1962. At the same time, he was busy writing novels, 15 of which were published between 1942 and 1962, two of them under the pseudonym of William Grew. Two movies were adapted from his novels and, once TV became a viable market in the 1950s, he had two stories and three novels adapted for television from his works. He wrote three teleplays himself, including "The Kind Waitress" for Alfred Hitchcock Presents. In addition, the first episode of Thriller was based on one of his novels.
"Over There--Darkness" won the Edgar Award for Best Short Story in 1959 and was collected in Best Detective Stories of the Year and again in Best of the Best Detective Stories. Bernard C. Schoenfeld adapted it for Alfred Hitchcock Presents and today it is probably O'Farrell's best-known work.
"Over There--Darkness" was first published here |
That night, she takes Vanessa for a walk, following the dog past the lighted area in front of her building and into the "sinister" darkness in front of a row of neighboring brownstones. She is attacked from behind and left unconscious on the sidewalk, her ring and money stolen. Police sergeant Kirby questions Miss Fox, who convinces herself that Eddie must be the thief. Summoned later that night to the police station, she denies that another young man was her assailant. The next day, she calls Eddie to her apartment and suggests that she will pay $500 for the return of her ring. Eddie does not realize that she suspects him, and later that day she tells Sergeant Kirby that Eddie was the thief. Eddie is tried, convicted, and sent to prison.
Late that fall, Sergeant Kirby tells Miss Fox that her ring was found in the room of the man whom she refused to identify at the police station. Eddie is released from prison and resumes his job. Miss Fox asks him to walk her dog, but he refuses. He no longer needs extra money; his fiance died. Miss Fox attempts to pay off her feelings of guilt by giving Eddie an envelope containing $500. That night, she heads outside to walk Vanessa. Again, a man attacks her from behind, this time killing her. When the doorman finds her corpse, she has five one-hundred dollar bills in her hand.
Bette Davis as Miss Fox |
Miss Fox seems unreasonably fearful about walking into the darkness that lies just beyond her own building, yet her fears are justified when she is attacked and robbed. Once again, her wealth and privilege are on display when she thinks of Sergeant Kirby as "plodding." She thinks that she has solved the crime on her own by jumping to conclusions based on little evidence, and her ego will not allow her to admit that the vulgar man in custody at the police station might be her assailant, since she has already solved the crime to her own satisfaction.
James Congdon as Eddie |
This well-written and well-received short story was quickly purchased by the producers of Alfred Hitchcock Presents and adapted for television by Bernard C. Schoenfeld. The episode aired on CBS on Sunday, January 25, 1959, only a few months after the story's first publication. As is often the case, narrative and description in the story are converted to dialogue in the TV show, which opens with Miss Fox (played perfectly by Bette Davis) talking to her dog in her apartment. "Never mention age," she tells Vanessa, and she then speaks to a framed photo of her dead fiancee and also to herself. The Miss Fox of the show is not as isolated as the character in the story; this woman is going out to play bridge with friends when Eddie arrives to fulfill his dog-walking duties. She flirts with the handsome young man but the attempt at romance is clearly one-sided. She tells him to have the superintendent of the building let him in if the dog ever needs walking and she is not home; this shows that she trusts him and that he has an approved way to get into her apartment, which may be important in considering the show's conclusion, which has been changed from that of the short story.
Frank Albertson as Sergeant Kirby |
As in the story, she walks her dog at night and is attacked. Sergeant Kirby interviews her in her apartment, and events from the story are compressed when he gets a telephone call about the suspect in custody and she accompanies him back to the police station. At the station, she denies that the man is her assailant and we see that he resembles Eddie. Eddie comes when called to her apartment and she offers to pay him to get her ring back; in a well-played exchange, she says one thing but means another and we are unable to tell if he is doing the same. Sergeant Kirby arrives and Miss Fox accuses Eddie, seeming like a spurned lover.
Almost a year later, Sergeant Kirby is clearly angry at Miss Fox when he arrives to tell her that the real thief has been caught. Miss Fox is defensive and even tries to put blame on the sergeant for arresting the wrong man. When she encounters Eddie later in the elevator and gives him the envelope containing $500, he tells her that his fiance "died while I was in prison" and the elevator doors close, shutting out Miss Fox and reinforcing the barrier between her and Eddie.
Arthur Marshall as Jerry |
Why did Schoenfeld move the ending of the story inside her apartment? Perhaps it was done to allow for a period of quiet relief after the scare from the alley cat. Still, this ending makes even less sense than the one in the story on which it is based. Why would Eddie enter her apartment, wait for her, and kill her there? It is not only inconsistent with his personality (unless he changed a great deal while in prison), but it is also a sure way to get caught. He will have to leave her apartment and find a way down 14 flights of stairs and out of the building without being seen. I can think of no valid reason for ending the story in this way.
The show centers around Bette Davis, who gives an outstanding performance. Her Miss Fox is more vibrant and outgoing than the character in the short story, who is portrayed as afraid to leave the area in front of her apartment building. She also is more overtly sexual in her interest in and flirtation with Eddie, as she vainly tries to deny her advancing age.
Miss Fox and Vanessa in the alley shortly before she is murdered |
Bette Davis (1908-1989) was one of the best and most successful actress of the classic Hollywood period. She started out on Broadway and began appearing in films in 1931, winning Academy Awards for Best Actress for her roles in Dangerous (1935) and Jezebel (1938). She also starred in the brilliant All About Eve (1950). She began appearing sporadically in television roles in 1956 and was seen in film and on TV for the rest of her life. A website devoted to her is found here. This was her only appearance on the Hitchcock show.
Giving a strong performance as Eddie is James Congdon (1929- ), who began appearing on TV in 1949 and on film in 1951. His career on screen lasted until 1986 but does not contain a large number of credits. He also appeared on Broadway from 1956 to 1984 and was in the original cast of The Miracle Worker in 1959. This was his only role on the Hitchcock TV show.
The role of Sergeant Kirby is played by Frank Albertson (1909-1964), a veteran character actor who appeared on film from 1923 and on TV from 1950. He was in four episodes of the Hitchcock show and also appeared on Thriller. He had a small role in Hitchcock's Psycho (1960).
Eddie, out of uniform on his day off |
The assignment to direct Bette Davis in "Out There--Darkness" was given to Paul Henreid (1908-1982), the actor-turned-director who had co-starred with Davis in Now, Voyager (1942). He directed 29 episodes of the Hitchcock series including "The Kind Waitress," which had a teleplay by William O'Farrell.
Making his only appearance on the list of crew members in all of the ten years of the Hitchcock TV show was director of photography Ernest Haller (1896-1970), who was Bette Davis's favorite cameraman. He went to Hollywood in 1914 and became a cinematographer in 1920, later winning an Academy Award for his work on Gone With the Wind (1939). He did some TV work from 1957 to 1966, including a 1957 episode of Suspicion that starred Bette Davis, and his final credit was for the second pilot of Star Trek, "Where No Man Has Gone Before."
Read the GenreSnaps take on this episode here. The TV show may be viewed online for free here or the DVD is available here.
Sources:
The FictionMags Index, www.philsp.com/homeville/FMI/0start.htm.
Galactic Central, philsp.com/.
Grams, Martin, and Patrik Wikstrom. The Alfred Hitchcock Presents Companion. OTR Pub., 2001.
IMDb, IMDb.com, www.imdb.com/.
O'Farrell, William. “Over There--Darkness.” Best of the Best Detective Stories, Ed. David Cooke. NY: Dutton, 1960. pp. 250-266.
“Out There--Darkness.” Alfred Hitchcock Presents, season 4, episode 16, CBS, 25 Jan. 1959.
Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, www.wikipedia.org/.
Special note: A podcast called "Presenting Alfred Hitchcock Presents" has begun appearing. One episode per month is examined in detail, and five episodes have appeared thus far. Here is a link to the podcast's website. I recommend giving this series a listen!
Good job, Jack. I have no problem with what you wrote, and I found the episode less than engaging; as it's plot driven it plays rather slowly, with little room for character development.
ReplyDeleteBette Davis was not sympathetic as the rich old woman; or at least I didn't think so. There was almost no big city hustle or bustle in this compact entry apparently filmed on a tight budget.
Or maybe most of the money allotted to it went to Miss Davis. Its intriguing premise didn't seem well thought out, and my sense is that time has not been kind to it, either, as it feels of another time; and indeed it is. The very mid-20th century ambiance and attitude make it feel almost like a period piece.
Women of the sort Miss Davis played have nearly vanished from the urban landscape, which is more dense now, with less sense of community even in affluent neighborhoods; and less familiarity between strangers who just happen to pass one another daily on the street, take the same train now and again, maybe even exchange newspapers once in a while.
An aside question regarding the AHP series. I'm trying to track down an episode of a TV show around the time of AHP. The plot centered around a troubled boy who acted pretty maliciously and seemed to be a little unstable. In one scene, he cut through the screen of (I think) his Grandparent's house to unlatch the door with his pocket knife. I know that's not much to go on, but this seems to be the place that scrutinizes episodes of this show. Any ideas?
ReplyDeleteJohn Kenrick-I guess I like the episode more than you do, though that ending bugs me. I'm often disappointed when the TV show removes the subtlety of the story on which it's based. I've always considered this episode special because of the participation of Bette Davis. Thanks for reading, as always, and Merry Christmas!
ReplyDeleteJohn-That story is not ringing a bell with me. Maybe another reader recalls it?
Bette Davis did make her one Hitchcock episode classy just by being in it...and I wish a Merry Christmas back at ya', Jack!
ReplyDeleteThe other John (no last name) referenced what I remember as an hour long Hitchcock episode, and I may as well respond to him now while I'm here...
John (no last name guy): I remember an Alfred Hitchcock hour long episode, To Catch A Butterfly (I think I got that right) that aired in early 1963. It played almost like a horror entry, as occasionally episodes in the longer show did. I can't recall all the details but he was a sick puppy, and that his father apparently abused him terribly when he was younger was offered as the reason. The actor who played him, Mickey Sholdar, was excellent, and he later turned up as a regular on The Farmer's Daughter TV series a little later on. Ed Asner played his nasty, two-faced father on the Hitchcock show.
ReplyDeleteJohn Kennrick -- You're right! Found the episode on Daily Motion. Incidentally, it was a window screen that he sliced up, not a door screen. Thanks for taking the time in solving this decades-long mystery! John @ Monster Magazine World
ReplyDeleteMy pleasure, the "other" John. That was a good, psychologically unsettling episode. The actor who played the kid solid it. That he was the most disturbing character in the story made it all the more frightening given that he was a child, as in yikes!
ReplyDeleteIt was particularly unnerving when I first watched it, as I was of a similar age as that boy; and while my father could be a nasty piece of work I fortunately didn't develop that kind of pathology.
There were a fair number of "kid shocker" type stories, on television and the movies in the wake of the 1956 film The Bad Seed. There was one I saw recently on the Hitch half-hour, The Young One, with a "diabolical" Carol Lynley.
I view Bette Davis' Miss Fox more sympathetically than most other viewers' comments here and elsewhere. She's a lonely woman worrying about her age, and ditsy enough to talk to her perfectly-named poodle Vanessa like it was her sister. Conversely, many seem to view the character of Eddie the doorman as the one we should root for, but why? Nothing Miss Fox did was so horrible as to justify his murder of her, not even remotely.
ReplyDeleteIt is true that her false identification of him as the thief put him behind bars for a year, but it's not like she was trying to railroad him (her perception was likely prejudiced by his refusal to go along with her advances toward him, but she talks herself into making him the suspect). After all, she is so desperate to get her ring back that she lets him know that he (or whomever the thief is) could get an $500--along with keeping the other $1500 stolen--just for returning the ring.
And yes, she refused to loan him money and his girlfriend ends up dying, but there was no indication that the refusal was malicious (self-centered, perhaps, but that doesn't necessarily equal malicious, a trait that isn't exhibited), and neither did she have a moral obligation to loan him money. It's not like he couldn't have gone to other people--his family and friends, his girlfriend's family and friends--to secure the money. Miss Fox comes off as uncharitable, but she didn't kill Eddie's girlfriend, whatever he thought. This strikes me as a plot weakness, because the conclusion is meant to makes us sympathize with him and feel that Miss Fox got just retribution from him, a karmic payback. That doesn't resonate with me.
Clearly, a year in jail has hardened Eddie, pushed him to the brink of borderline psychotic (and maybe over the brink), and he ends up the real villain in this, despite all attempts to put the focus on Miss Fox. Her greatest "crime" in the episode, aside from her narcissism, is getting to friendly with a deranged man.
This was a very enjoyable performance from Miss Bette Davis. She was very believable even in this minor part--yet another example of her plus plus acting talent.
Thanks, John! There were definitely moral shadings in both characters. No one can condone murder, but she certainly didn't do him any favors.
ReplyDelete